23 October 2008
Judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-274/05
Commission v
Following complaints from 37 individuals, the Commission brought an action against
The Commission complained that
In this respect, the Court recalls that Community law has established a general system for the recognition of higher-education diplomas awarded on completion of professional education and training of at least three years’ duration1. The general system for the recognition of higher-education diplomas is based on the mutual trust that Member States have in the professional qualifications that they award. That system does not involve recognition of a diploma for its intrinsic value, but establishes a presumption that the qualifications of a person entitled to pursue a regulated profession in one
The Court underlines that it is for the competent authorities awarding the diplomas (home Member State ) alone to verify, in the light of the rules applicable in their professional education and training systems, the conditions necessary for their award and the nature of the establishment in which the holder received his education and training. By contrast, the host
1 Council Directive 89/48/EEC of 21 December 1988 on a general system for the recognition of higher-education diplomas awarded on completion of professional education and training of at least three years’ duration (OJ 1989 L 19, p. 16), transposed into Greek law in 2000.
The Court rejects Greece’s approach – which is to apply its own rules (as the Member State in which the education and training were received) – since that would have the effect of treating persons who received education and training of an equivalent quality differently, that is to say, depending on the Member State in which they undertook their education and training. The Court also notes that the education and training must not necessarily have been received in a university or in a higher-education establishment.
As regards ‘compensatory measures’, the directive – far from obliging the Member States to recognise diplomas automatically and unconditionally – enables the host State in certain cases to require an adaptation period or an aptitude test, the choice of which is in principle left to the person applying for recognition of the diploma. The directive provides for derogations from that principle, but the Court states that
The Greek provisions moreover entrust a specific body2 with the power to verify, first, whether the establishment which provides the education and training is a higher-education establishment and, second, whether the applicant has the necessary professional experience, in a case where the duration of the education and training falls short by at least one year of that required in Greece in order to pursue that profession. The Court holds that that provision is incompatible with the Directive. The matters which that body is called upon to verify are already definitively established by certificates and documents issued by the competent authorities of the
Lastly, the Court finds that there has been an infringement of the Directive in that, in the public sector, there is no possibility of hierarchical and/or salary reclassification of persons recruited – as holders of a diploma awarded in another Member State – at a grade lower than that to which they would have been entitled if their diplomas had been recognised in accordance with that directive.
2 Symvoulio Anagnoriseos Epangelmatikis Isotimias Titlon Tritovathmias Ekpaidefsis or ‘Saeitte’ (the Council Responsible for Recognising Professional Equivalence of Higher-Education Qualifications).
Posts
